Finance & economics | Prosecuting bankers

Blind justice

Why have so few bankers gone to jail for their part in the crisis?

CRIME sometimes pays unusual social dividends. In 2010 São Paulo’s museum of modern art hosted an exhibition of works that had been seized from a variety of crooks and drug traffickers. Some of the art had belonged to the founder of a Brazilian bank, Banco Santos, that had collapsed in 2005. After the bank’s liquidation Edemar Cid Ferreira lost his art collection and his home, was convicted of “crimes against the national financial system” and money-laundering, and sentenced to 21 years in jail.

For better or worse, many people would love to see more bankers behind bars for their role in blowing up the West’s financial system. In Britain not one senior banker has faced criminal charges relating to the failure of his institution. A handful have faced the lesser sanction of being barred from running another bank or company, or agreeing in settlements with regulators not to do so. (Policymakers have proposed introducing a “rebuttable presumption” that the directors of a failed bank should be automatically barred from running another unless they could prove they weren’t at fault.)

This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline "Blind justice"

Let’s party like it’s 1793

From the May 4th 2013 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Finance & economics

The property firm that could break China’s back

If Vanke collapses, so might confidence in the state’s management of the economy

Narendra Modi’s flagship growth scheme is off to a sluggish start

Without improvements, it risks wasting trillions of rupees


Diego Maradona offers central bankers enduring lessons

Recent years ought to have reduced the importance of a skilful feint. They have not