Gulliver | TSA shutdown

A new security headache

American political leaders have figured out a way to make airport security even worse

By N.B. | Washington, DC

IT MIGHT seem impossible, but America's political leaders have figured out a way to make airport security even more maddening: furlough tens of thousands of Transportation Security Administration (TSA) workers.

The TSA, which is responsible for screening air passengers, is part of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which has found itself at the centre of a political fight. The DHS has been tasked with carrying out President Barack Obama's plan temporarily to shield millions of unauthorised immigrants from deportation. Congress must reauthorise funding for the department by February 27th. Republicans, who control both houses, have advanced bills that would fund the DHS—but also block Mr Obama's plans. The president has said he won't sign any reauthorisation that blocks his immigration actions. A partial government shutdown looms. (In the most recent edition of The Economist our Lexington columnist argued that "Congress should do its job and fund the DHS.")

If the DHS does run out of money, business travellers could be in for a bad time. The TSA is already drawing up plans to furlough about 15% of its workforce, Skift reports. Other DHS employees, including Customs and Border Protection agents, would have to work without pay. Fewer TSA employees and grumpy, unpaid CBP officers is, needless to say, a recipe for long lines and hugely unpleasant air travel. The Global Business Travel Association (GBTA) has warned that a shutdown will almost certainly lead to cancelled trips, damaging the travel industry and the overall economy. During the last government shutdown, in 2013, more than half of business travellers in a GBTA member survey said they had cancelled business trips or other bookings.

In other words, Lexington is right.

More from Gulliver

How much will Hong Kong's protests damage visitor numbers?

Tourism is a surprisingly resilient industry—but only if governments want it to be

Why Hong Kong’s airport was a good target for protesters

The streets of 19th-century Paris and the postmodern architecture of Hong Kong’s main terminal have much in common


Why trains are not always as green as they seem

The “flight-shame” movement encourages travellers to go by train instead of plane. But not all rail lines are environmentally friendly