The Economist explains

What do Satanists believe?

By J.F. | ATLANTA

IN NOVEMBER 2012, a stone monument inscribed with the Ten Commandments was placed on the grounds of Oklahoma's state capitol. Seven years earlier, in a case called Van Orden v Perry, the United States Supreme Court had ruled that a Ten Commandments monument placed on the Texas state capitol grounds did not violate the First Amendment's clause forbidding government from making any law “respecting the establishment of religion”. But if that ruling allows Christian monuments, it ought to allow others, too. Accordingly, in December 2013 the Satanic Temple launched a campaign to place a monument of its own next to the Ten Commandments, reasoning that it would give Oklahomans “the opportunity to show that they espouse the basic freedoms spelled out in the Constitution”. The Satanists duly unveiled their monument’s proposed design: a winged creature with the torso of a man, the head of a goat and horns sits on a throne beneath a Pentagram, two fingers sagely raised as two children look on in wonder. America’s Satanists, it seems, have a sense of humour. But what do they actually believe?

That turns out to be a difficult question to answer. Perhaps unsurprisingly, Satanists are a rather fractious bunch, with many different organisations, beliefs and rituals. Many of these organisations are wholly or partly occult, with much hidden from non-adherents. Some are spiritualists: they worship Satan as a deity. Adherents of the Joy of Satan Ministries, for instance, “know Satan/Lucifer as a real being”, and believe he is “the True Father and Creator God of humanity”. Others—notably the Church of Satan, founded by Anton LaVey, the most renowned occultist since Aleister Crowley; and the Satanic Temple—are materialist, and reject belief in supernatural beings. Lucien Greaves, a spokesman for the Satanic Temple, describes himself as “an atheist when it comes to supernatural beliefs”, and says that for him Satanism stands for “individual sovereignty in the face of tyranny, and the pursuit of knowledge even when that knowledge is dangerous”. LaVey’s “Satanic Bible” proclaims “Life is the great indulgence—death the great abstinence! Therefore make the most of the HERE AND NOW! ... Choose ye this day, this hour, for no redeemer liveth!”

Despite these differences, certain commonalities link many spiritual and materialist branches of Satanism: namely a belief that the worship of a supernatural deity—and the ecclesiastical structure that evolved to support such worship—places needless restrictions on human knowledge and progress; and a belief in science, rationality and learning, without restrictions. Peter Gilmore, LaVey’s successor as head of the Church of Satan, distinguishes between “carnal people and spiritual people”: he believes the latter need a “spooky daddy in the sky”, whereas he is “happy being the center of [his] universe”. In this sense, materialist Satanism seems close to, if not indistinguishable from, organised atheism, or perhaps atheism with rituals. But Mr Gilmore says his church uses Satan in the original Hebrew sense as “The Adversary”—“a figure who will stand up and challenge”. Satan in this sense becomes a sort of literary figure or metonymy for challenging orthodoxy, rather than an evil or bloodthirsty god.

All of this is considerably less headline-grabbing than animal sacrifice or ritual murder. And, of course, some people have been convicted of horrificacts nominally committed in the name of Satan. But these are hardly the first murders committed in a religion’s name, and there is no evidence to suggest that such killers are more representative of Satanism than other religiously inspired murderers are of their faiths. And what of the Oklahoman Satanists’ proposed statue? After a lengthy legal battle, the state Supreme Court ordered the removal of the Ten Commandants statue, on the basis that it violated the state’s constitutional ban against the use of public property to benefit a religion. That meant the Satanists’ monument would not be allowed either. They unveiled it in Detroit in July 2015, and have since been lobbying to have it installed in Arkansas. Like Oklahoma before it, it has voted to erect a Ten Commandments monument on the grounds of its state capitol, to the dismay of atheists, humanists—and Satanists, too.

Update: This blog post has been amended to remove the news peg.

More from The Economist explains

The growing role of fighting robots on the ground in Ukraine

Drones already fill the skies. Now uncrewed vehicles are heading to the front lines

Why do cicadas have such a strange life cycle?

Two broods will soon emerge simultaneously for the first time in 221 years