The Economist explains

Stephen Hawking's answer to a 40-year-old paradox about black holes

By D.J.P.

FEW topics in physics so capture the imagination as black holes. They are the sites of wholesale gravitational collapse: stellar remnants fold in on themselves, reaching a density so extreme that it pokes an incomprehensible little hole in the fabric of space itself. The resulting gravitational pull is so great, the story goes, that anything that crosses a point of no return—the event horizon—is lost, in its entirety, forever. But even that simple formulation comes with a wrinkle that has had theorists pulling their hair out for four decades. This week Stephen Hawking, a physicist known for his work on the astronomical phenomenon, put forward a possible solution to the paradox. But what is the kerfuffle all about?

More from The Economist explains

What are the obligations of Israel and Hamas to protect civilians?

International Humanitarian Law creates obligations—but contains numerous caveats

Why is so much of the internet’s infrastructure run by volunteers?

Malware smuggled into XZ Utils software highlights a bigger problem


The growing role of fighting robots on the ground in Ukraine

Drones already fill the skies. Now uncrewed vehicles are heading to the front lines