Gulliver | Finding ways around baggage fees

In the heat of the moment

A singer discovers an extreme way to dodge airline charges

By B.R.

THE mishap that befell James McElvar, a singer with a boy-band called Rewind (no, nor Gulliver), is an air-fable for our times. Mr McElvar was trying to board an easyJet flight from London to Glasgow with a small bag and a suitcase as hand-luggage. The airline told him that he would have to check one of them into the hold at a cost of £45 ($70). That is annoying, but passengers should know well enough by now to check the carry-on allowance before flying with a budget carrier, so sympathy does not run that deep.

Mr McElvar’s response, however, was worthy of some sort of award—although whether for elan or stupidity readers will have to decide. Rather than pay the extra fee, the singer simply emptied his bag and dressed himself in all the clothes that were in it—12 layers in all. The BBC breaks down the new outfit as consisting of four jumpers, six T-shirts, three pairs of jeans, two pairs of jogging bottoms, two jackets and two hats (almost recreated right). Gulliver’s first response is to marvel at any man who manages to squeeze into three pairs of jeans, particularly the super-skinny kind so beloved by kids nowadays. But the feeling of triumph that Mr McElvar felt at getting one over on the airline was short-lived. Aboard the flight he succumbed to heat exhaustion, was violently sick and collapsed. The paramedics who attended to him said he was lucky to be alive.

Thankfully, our hero made a swift recovery, which is why we are allowed to poke fun at him. Yet, many readers will have played a similar game, albeit a less extreme version. Certainly I have found myself on countless occasions boarding a flight in the height of summer with a thick leather jacket tied around my waist, plus a couple of extra layers, in order to cram a little more into my hand luggage. A companion on a flight in South East Asia found that her suitcase was a few kilos over, so we redistributed some of our clothes across our cases and both ended up sporting hefty jumpers to the gate.

Mostly, such sweaty sacrifices are worthwhile in order to fly with hand luggage only, and not only because of the cost. Nature abhors a vacuum, but it hates unused space in a checked suitcase more. If we are paying £45 to book a bag into the hold we think we may as well get our money’s worth. So we inevitably end up over-packing and then exhaust ourselves dragging an unnecessarily heavy bag to the airport.

There are other ways to sneak more stuff onto a plane, notably “wearable luggage”. These are essentially coats with countless large pockets in which to store extra belongings and in some cases even extra clothes. This then frees up space in a carry-on bag. Their biggest drawback is that they make the wearer look ridiculous. But then again, perhaps not quite as ridiculous as a prone and impressively padded Mr McElvar.

More from Gulliver

How much will Hong Kong's protests damage visitor numbers?

Tourism is a surprisingly resilient industry—but only if governments want it to be

Why Hong Kong’s airport was a good target for protesters

The streets of 19th-century Paris and the postmodern architecture of Hong Kong’s main terminal have much in common


Why trains are not always as green as they seem

The “flight-shame” movement encourages travellers to go by train instead of plane. But not all rail lines are environmentally friendly