Finance & economics | Abenomics

Less of the same

The Japanese government’s three new economic arrows miss their mark

An economic stimulus plan
|TOKYO

Updated October 1st 2015

AFTER four months battling to pass unpopular security legislation, Shinzo Abe, Japan’s prime minister, lost no time in returning to somewhat safer ground: the economy. On September 24th he fired off what he called “three new arrows” in service of Abenomics, his programme of monetary easing, fiscal stimulus and far-reaching structural reform. Yet recent data suggest the economy may offer Mr Abe no respite from a bruising year.

Japan’s GDP shrank by 1.2% on an annualised basis in the second quarter, after expanding in the first. Now worries about the third quarter are mounting. Industrial production continued to fall in August, suggesting that the economy may even have entered recession in the quarter. In addition, for the first time since the government embarked on Abenomics in April 2013, prices in Japan are falling again, albeit only slightly. One key gauge of inflation, core CPI (the consumer-price index excluding fresh food), fell by 0.1% in August.

It is all dire news for the Bank of Japan (BoJ), which is supposed to get prices rising by 2% a year by next autumn. The bank’s preferred measure of inflation is now “core core” CPI, which excludes energy as well as food, and which is rising. Yet broad inflation expectations may be affected by the news of deflation’s return. The BoJ will surely come under renewed pressure to expand its existing programme of monetary easing at the end of October, when it is due to update its economic forecasts.

Mr Abe’s new arrows did little to pierce the gloom. The first, a pledge to boost nominal GDP by 22% to ¥600 trillion ($5 trillion), was met with scepticism since Mr Abe gave no time frame, nor any detail on how to reach it. Nominal GDP has been rising consistently since he returned to office—but by an average of just 2.3% a year since the start of 2013.

The new GDP target certainly underscored the government’s determination to pursue economic growth rather than focus on Japan’s huge sovereign debt, which now stands at 246% of GDP. But that does not go down well with credit-rating agencies. The latest to downgrade Japan’s debt was Standard & Poor’s on September 16th. Since Japanese institutions and households hold the bulk of the outstanding debt, and the BoJ is buying almost all new issuance, yields barely budged. But the move signals scepticism that Japan can grow its way out of its problems.

Mr Abe’s second and third new arrows were aimed at his domestic audience and merely embellished his existing programme of structural reform, which has disappointed. He promised greater financial support for families in order to raise Japan’s low birth rate, as well as extra nursing facilities for the elderly. He repeated a pledge to stop the population falling below 100m (on current trends Japan’s population of 127m is set to fall to 87m by 2060).

Reformers worry that the new arrows are substitutes for much sharper ones that Mr Abe has promised to use, but left in the quiver—most notably, an assault on privileged groups, including farmers, doctors and pharmacists, that collectively stifle the economy. Abenomics now risks veering away from its original ambition into populism and misguided policy, says Takatoshi Ito of Columbia University, a former adviser to the prime minister.

Mr Abe was bolder in front of international investors this week in New York. He promised further steps on corporate governance, where much has already been achieved. He would speedily conclude negotiations on the Trans-Pacific Partnership, an ambitious free-trade agreement, he said. A trade deal would help liberalise the economy.

An even bolder step, and perhaps the only plausible way to deal with Japan’s demographic problem, would be to back higher levels of permanent immigration. Despite Mr Abe’s promise to stabilise the population, he shows no willingness to go so far. At the United Nations this week, he pledged to triple aid for refugees and displaced people from Syria and Iraq, but ruled out taking any in. After three years and six arrows, Mr Abe’s knack for archery is in growing doubt.

This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline "Less of the same"

Dominant and dangerous

From the October 3rd 2015 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

Discover more

China’s banks have a bad-debt problem

As is becoming increasingly obvious

Which country will be last to escape inflation?

A new dividing line in the global fight


How the “Magnificent Seven” misleads

Forget the supergroup of stockmarket darlings