Finance and economics | The Trans-Pacific Partnership

Weighing anchor

Negotiators agree on an ambitious trade deal, but opposition to its ratification is already fierce

DONALD TRUMP, an American presidential candidate, denounced it as “a terrible deal”. Another, Hillary Clinton, does not think it meets “the high bar” that should be applied to trade pacts. Yet proponents of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), which encompasses 12 countries in Asia and the Americas, including America and Japan, herald it as the biggest multilateral trade deal in 20 years, which will “define the rules of the road” for international commerce. Which is it?

TPP will apply to 40% of the world’s economy. For American exporters alone, 18,000 individual tariffs will be reduced to zero. Much the same will be true for firms in the other 11 members. Even agricultural barriers, usually among the most heavily defended, will start to come down. Foreigners will gain a toehold in Canada’s dairy sector and a bigger share of Japan’s beef market, for example. Some of these reductions will be phased in lamentably slowly, however: American tariffs on Japanese lorries will last another 30 years.

This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline "Weighing anchor"

Kill seven diseases, save 1.2m lives a year

From the October 10th 2015 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Finance and economics

How Ukrainians are using the cover of war to escape taxes

“Black grain” infuriates exporters playing by the rules

What campus protesters get wrong about divestment

Will withdrawing money hurt Israel?


Hedge funds make billions as India’s options market goes ballistic

The country’s retail investors are doing less well