United States | Lexington

The politics of panic

Two front-runners for the Republican nomination seem ready to harm America to win

A DAY after Donald Trump called for a “total and complete shutdown” on Muslims entering America, until the government can “figure out” the threat of terrorism, the property tycoon and presidential candidate was invited on television to say how his scheme might work. For instance, how might border guards spot Muslim travellers, given that most passports do not record a holder’s religion, an interviewer asked? Mr Trump was ready for that one. “They would say: ‘Are you Muslim?’” he explained.

There was no sniggering from Republican rivals. They have spent too many months watching Mr Trump lead in opinion polls of conservative voters, even as he tramples facts, insults opponents and makes fantastical promises that would get any other candidate hooted off the stage. His Muslim travel ban may be unworkable, probably illegal, shameful and a propaganda coup for Islamic State (IS). But this is the candidate who Republican supporters have named, repeatedly, as the most trustworthy on national security—though his only direct experience in that field was as a pupil at a military boarding school. Recent terror attacks have left Mr Trump almost giddy. “Every time things get worse, I do better,” he bragged to a crowd in Iowa, days after a mass-shooting in San Bernardino, California. “We’re going to be so vigilant,” he added. “We’re going to be so tough and so mean and so nasty.”

This article appeared in the United States section of the print edition under the headline "The politics of panic"

Playing with fear

From the December 12th 2015 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from United States

After a season of Gaza protests, America’s university graduates are polarised but resilient

After enduring covid and turmoil over free speech, the class of 2024 finally takes its bow

Can playing cards help catch criminals?

A novel idea for solving cold cases comes with high-stakes risks


The world’s slowest bullet train trundles ahead in California

An extra $3bn of federal funding is nice; as for the other $80bn, dream on