Britain | Human rights

There may be trouble ahead

Getting rid of the Human Rights Act will be tough—and almost pointless

WITH a tiny majority and what could prove fleeting co-operation from irascible backbenchers, David Cameron is anxious to move quickly in his second term. Among the priorities for his first 100 days is the abolition of the Human Rights Act (HRA). It is not his best idea.

The act, passed by a Labour government in 1998, incorporated into British law the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which Britain signed—and indeed helped to write—more than 60 years ago. It allows Britons to challenge human-rights violations in British courts rather than going to the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg.

This article appeared in the Britain section of the print edition under the headline "There may be trouble ahead"

The great distortion: A dangerous flaw at the heart of the world economy

From the May 16th 2015 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Britain

Why Britain’s membership of the ECHR has become a political issue

And why leaving would be a mistake

The ECtHR’s Swiss climate ruling: overreach or appropriate?

A ruling on behalf of pensioners does not mean the court has gone rogue


Why are so many bodies in Britain found in a decomposed state?

To understand Britons’ social isolation, consider their corpses