There may be trouble ahead
Getting rid of the Human Rights Act will be tough—and almost pointless
WITH a tiny majority and what could prove fleeting co-operation from irascible backbenchers, David Cameron is anxious to move quickly in his second term. Among the priorities for his first 100 days is the abolition of the Human Rights Act (HRA). It is not his best idea.
The act, passed by a Labour government in 1998, incorporated into British law the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which Britain signed—and indeed helped to write—more than 60 years ago. It allows Britons to challenge human-rights violations in British courts rather than going to the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg.
This article appeared in the Britain section of the print edition under the headline "There may be trouble ahead"
More from Britain
Why Britain’s membership of the ECHR has become a political issue
And why leaving would be a mistake
The ECtHR’s Swiss climate ruling: overreach or appropriate?
A ruling on behalf of pensioners does not mean the court has gone rogue
Why are so many bodies in Britain found in a decomposed state?
To understand Britons’ social isolation, consider their corpses