Asia | Marine protected areas

Pitcairn’s bounty

The South Pacific is about to get the world’s biggest national park

ON LAND, nature reserves are ten a penny. About one-sixth of the earth’s land surface is protected in one way or another. Reserves at sea are much scarcer, covering, at most, 3%. But a proposal to designate the Exclusive Economic Zone around the Pitcairn islands in the South Pacific as a marine protected area (MPA) may help redress the balance.

The British dependency of Pitcairn (population, 65) is home to descendants of the Bounty mutineers. The idea of a reserve, promoted by the American-based Pew Charitable Trusts, is to ban fishing in 830,000 square km (320,000 square miles) of sea around Pitcairn. The immediate cost to Pitcairn’s economy would be trivial: some $30,000 in licence fees for tuna fishing forgone each year. In return the world’s smallest democracy would not only enjoy the kudos of having the world’s biggest MPA, but also hope to draw tourists. The Great Barrier Reef is reckoned to bring in about $4 billion for Australia each year.

Hopes are high that the British government will endorse the idea. Pitcairn relies on annual British subsidies equivalent to £50,000 ($81,000) per inhabitant. And the MPA plan is broadly welcomed by islanders. Simon Young, Pitcairn’s deputy mayor, says it has “always been a seafaring nation, protective of its marine environment”. If Britain enacted legislation for the reserve, it would not face local opposition as it did when it designated a reserve around the Chagos archipelago in the Indian Ocean in 2010. Locals had been forced out in the late 1960s and early 1970s to make way for an American base; the reserve was seen as another way to stop them ever returning.

The Pitcairn islands could scarcely be more remote, with New Zealand 4,800km (3,000 miles) to the west and Ecuador 6,000km to the east. Arguably, this isolation prevents overfishing. The worst overfishing takes place in what Peter Jones, a geographer, calls “metropolitan seas” near larger populations. It is, he says, politically easier to designate an MPA in a remote area than where fisheries are heavily used. Britain’s struggle to create significant MPAs around its own coast underlines the point.

This article appeared in the Asia section of the print edition under the headline "Pitcairn’s bounty"

Subterranean capitalist blues

From the October 26th 2013 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

Discover more

Why India’s elites back Narendra Modi

Rich, educated voters usually disdain populists. Three factors explain why India’s leader is different

What next for Pakistan?

The new government faces polarised politics, a faltering economy and terrorist threats


The Islamic State’s branch in Afghanistan is at war with the world

The group which claimed responsibility for the Crocus City Hall attack is increasingly worrying