One consequence of increasing tuition fees is that a far smaller proportion of students will repay their debt in full under the new system than under the old one. And recently, as the salaries of new graduates have stagnated, the forecasts have become even less optimistic. According to analysis by the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), a think-tank, 73% of graduates will not repay their loans in full (see chart). The government now expects to recover just 55% of its costs, against an estimate of 72% in 2010.
Yet in other ways the loan system is working impressively. With the worrying exception of part-timers, few students have been deterred from applying to university. Last year the proportion of 18- and 19-year-olds entering was the highest ever. Between 2011 and 2013 the number of students who had been entitled to free school meals entering the most academically demanding universities jumped by 39%. The IFS analysis also shows that the new system is remarkably progressive—those students who go on to earn the largest salaries pay back the most.
Better, universities do appear to be getting more competitive as a result. Sir Steve Smith, vice-chancellor of Exeter University, says that since fees were increased, students have become savvier—insisting that academics actually mark their essays within a few weeks, for instance. Applications to the best-ranked universities have leapt and many—including Exeter—are expanding to increase their fee income. Less prestigious institutions, too, are fighting harder to keep their students.
Low repayment rates threaten to undo this. The next government will have either to find more money for higher education or to cut spending, says Peter Scott, of the Institute of Education, a research university. In December George Osborne, the chancellor of the exchequer, announced plans to remove a government cap that limits total student numbers. That may now be difficult. Posh universities fear the government will instead cut grants for science or research. Less posh ones worry about being squeezed by loosely regulated private providers offering cheap courses.