Democracy in America | Economic growth

Slowly, slowly

Things aren't getting much better for most American families, but there are signs they have stopped getting worse

By G.I. | WASHINGTON, DC

THE economic recovery since the Great Recession has been subdued by historic standards. Typical families have born the brunt of this sluggish growth, thanks to rising inequality. But there are signs that even if things aren’t getting better for these families, they have stopped getting worse. On September 16th the Census Bureau reported that real (that is inflation-adjusted) median household income rose 0.3% in 2013 from 2012, the first increase since 2007. Poverty also fell for the first time since 2006: 14.5% of families lived below the poverty line, defined as $24,028 for a family of four, down from 15% in 2012.

The gains aren’t much. In fact, the 0.3% increase is statistically insignificant and barely begins to dig the typical family out its post-recession hole. The median income is still 8% lower than in 2007.

The report doesn’t get into why median incomes rose. There two likely causes. One is a decline in inflation thanks to falling energy prices, which helps bolster real incomes. Inflation has remained low this year, but that can’t deliver a lasting boost because lower inflation tends to lead to lower wage growth.

The other, more durable benefit is a steady pace of job creation, which means more members of households are working. Sentier Research, a private outfit, reckons real median incomes are up 1% so far this year, thanks largely to rising employment. Nominal wages are still growing sluggishly, however. Indeed, the structural causes of weak wage growth and inequality remain, most notably the hollowing of well-paid middle-income jobs for those with limited education, particularly men. Last year, male full-time workers’ income was stagnant while that of women rose 2.1%. The ratio of female to male earnings reached 78%, the highest on record.

Inequality did not grow last year, based on several yardsticks. Average incomes did grow faster than median incomes, by 0.5%, but there was no uniform pattern across income groups. Average incomes changed little for the bottom 20% and top 5% of households, while it rose for most in the middle. The Gini coefficient, a measure of inequality (1=maximum inequality, 0=total equality), was 0.476, virtually unchanged from its level of the prior two years.

More from Democracy in America

The fifth Democratic primary debate showed that a cull is overdue

Thinning out the field of Democrats could focus minds on the way to Iowa’s caucuses

The election for Kentucky’s governor will be a referendum on Donald Trump

Matt Bevin, the unpopular incumbent, hopes to survive a formidable challenge by aligning himself with the president


A state court blocks North Carolina’s Republican-friendly map

The gerrymandering fix could help Democrats keep the House in 2020