Analects | China and Iceland

Warming up to Iceland

The Arctic is worth more to the Europe trade than its ports alone

By T.P. | BEIJING

Shall we try the Northern route?

WITH a population of 320,000—just one tenth that of the Beijing district where it keeps its embassy to China—Iceland has recently become an object of inordinate interest to Chinese policymakers. The two nations signed a free-trade agreement on April 15th, China’s first with any European nation. But with the inherently tiny potential of Iceland’s market, and the lack of any roundabout low-tariff access to other European markets through this deal, trade alone cannot account for China’s infatuation with Iceland.

The more likely attraction for China is access to improving shipping routes through the Arctic as that region warms due to climate change. Last month, one of China’s top experts on polar policy predicted that, by 2020, as much as 15% of his country’s trade would move through the Arctic’s Northern Sea Route. Even if that estimate is exaggerated, there is no reason to doubt that continued shrinking of Arctic ice cover will enhance the area’s importance.

Like South Korea and Japan, China hopes next month to be approved for permanent observer status on the Arctic Council, an eight-member intergovernmental body that seeks to co-ordinate policy for the area. But according to Linda Jakobson, the director of the East Asia programme at Australia’s Lowy Institute for International Policy, China’s Arctic aspirations have “evoked the same kind of concern, even anxiety, that throughout history has accompanied the rise of a large power.” Those concerns, she writes, were aggravated by the “aggressive posture of China’s representative” five months ago at the council’s observers' meeting in Sweden.

An odd-looking effort by a Chinese developer to build an “eco-golf course” and luxury resort on a 300 square km tract in Iceland’s desolate north-east corner also aroused suspicions about China’s strategic intentions in the region. The logic behind the proposal to create a haven of solitude and clean air for wealthy Chinese visitors failed to convince Icelandic officials, who did not agree to waive restrictions against foreign ownership of land.

The new trade agreement, signed during a five-day visit to China by Iceland's prime minister, Johanna Sigurdardottir, will result in the waiver in coming years of most tariffs in the two countries’ bilateral trade, which last year rose to $424m, by Iceland’s reckoning.

But for China, the ability to import more Icelandic fish with lower tariff duties would seem to pale in comparison to the importance of enhancing its influence in the region.

According to Anne-Marie Brady, an expert at New Zealand’s University of Canterbury, current arrangements leave China shut out of multilateral decision-making about the changing Arctic environment. The desire to have a greater say, and assert its legitimate interests in the region, she recently wrote, is behind a curious new bit of official phraseology. China’s own experts have taken to calling it a “near Arctic state.”

(Picture credit: AFP / Wang Zhao)

More from Analects

Analects says "Goodbye"

The other Occupy Central

Hong Kong’s protesting students may have a long wait for equal treatment if the treatment of housemaids is any guide


Crosses to bear

THE atheist Communist Party is faced with the growing popularity of religion