Britain | Human rights and Europe

Playing to the right

The Conservatives’ plans to reform human-rights laws are a muddle

It says Abu Qatada must be deported

“UNWORKABLE”, “contradictory” and “incoherent”. Those were among the epithets that have greeted the Conservative Party’s plans to reform Britain’s human-rights laws. The Tories have long wanted to scrap the Human Rights Act (HRA), passed in 1998 by a Labour government. On October 3rd Chris Grayling, the justice secretary, promised to do just that as the Tories gear up for a May election in which the Eurosceptic UK Independence Party (UKIP) threatens to lure away voters. In fact, the reforms will change less than supporters hope or critics fear.

The HRA incorporated into British law the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which Britain signed (and helped to draft) more than half a century ago. The act allowed Britons to pursue human-rights violations in British courts, rather than going to the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg. Although demonised by the Tories as European interventionism, the HRA actually made it more likely that human-rights cases would be heard in domestic courts, albeit in the light of internationally agreed principles.

This article appeared in the Britain section of the print edition under the headline "Playing to the right"

The gay divide

From the October 11th 2014 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Britain

What police commissioners tell you about the British election

Neither Labour landslide nor hung Parliament

Antisemitism is on the rise in Britain

But university encampments show how hard it is to define


Spies, trade and tech: China’s relationship with Britain

China was once seen as a golden opportunity. It is increasingly viewed as a threat