Whose emergency in Venezuela?
The region should ignore ill-advised American sanctions and hold Nicolás Maduro to account
IT WAS the kind of diplomatic clumsiness for which the United States has a unique capacity. On March 9th Barack Obama issued an executive order declaring “a national emergency” because of the “extraordinary threat to the national security” of the United States posed by Venezuela. Really? Is Uncle Sam scared of a country with a government that is incapable of organising a reliable supply of toilet paper, an army whose best-known capabilities are coups, petrol smuggling and drug trafficking, and a president who spent most of January touring the world to beg for cash?
The explanation is that American law requires the administration to use such language if it wants to impose sanctions on individuals in another country. Congress has voted to do this in the case of Venezuela. Critics of this initiative argued that its only practical effect would be to give Nicolás Maduro, Venezuela’s embattled president, a propaganda tool. That is what it has done.
This article appeared in the The Americas section of the print edition under the headline "Whose emergency in Venezuela?"
More from The Americas
Years of growth forged prosaic politics. Now Panamanians are fed up
They will elect a new president on May 5th
Latin America’s farmers are cashing in on hot hot cocoa prices
They aim to spend the windfall improving their technology to expand production
Andrés Manuel López Obrador will haunt his successor
Mexico’s next president will struggle against gangs, poverty and migration