Gulliver | Rules at hotels

Lactose intolerance

By B.R.

A GROUP of mothers staged a “nurse-in” outside Claridge's, a posh London hotel, today. The demonstrators took to breast-feeding their children outside the establishment in protest against its treatment of a young mother earlier this week. Louise Burns was taking afternoon tea at the hotel and began breast-feeding her hungry baby. A waiter told her—politely, by Ms Burns’s own account—that it was Claridge’s policy to ask mothers to cover up while feeding. He then produced a large napkin to drape over the baby. An embarrassed Ms Burns tweeted the episode (pictured), the Guardianpicked it up, and a debate about the rights and wrongs of Claridge’s actions ensued. Nigel Farage, leader of UKIP, a popular right-wing political party, added fuel when he suggested that mothers might prefer to “sit in a corner” when breast-feeding so as not to upset others.

We are all surely now big enough and old enough not to be bothered about women breast-feeding in public. It seems silly that there should still be any stigma attached to it; it is a natural act that harms no one. Those sensitive souls who are offended at the sight should try averting their gazes. (And in any case, on a purely selfish level, surely it is better that mums feel comfortable enough to breast-feed in coffee-shops, or on buses and planes, rather than the rest of us having to put up with a screaming baby.)

To be fair to Claridge's, it does not ban the act. It asks that women cover up with a shawl or, in this case, a large napkin—out of respect, it says, for other guests. Yet most women are perfectly capable of breast-feeding discreetly. If anything is going to the draw prudes’ attention to what is going on, it is placing an oversize white serviette on the baby’s head.

One counter-argument goes that, even if not inherently offensive, not all behaviour is appropriate for all settings. Hotels set all manner of arbitrary rules because they wish to convey a certain image. Decrees that Gulliver has fallen foul of include the prohibition of headphones, and of jeans at breakfast (and boy did he feel silly eating his toast in the previous night’s tuxedo). Mobile phones are an everyday part of life, but if a hotel wanted to stop guests from using them in its restaurants, they would find Gulliver right behind them. But breast-feeding is different. Banning it discriminates against a specific group—new mothers—and as such might be illegal in Britain in any case. That should give establishments pause for thought; after all, lawyers, like babies, are prone to milking opportunities for all they're worth.

Discover more

How much will Hong Kong's protests damage visitor numbers?

Tourism is a surprisingly resilient industry—but only if governments want it to be

Why Hong Kong’s airport was a good target for protesters

The streets of 19th-century Paris and the postmodern architecture of Hong Kong’s main terminal have much in common


Why trains are not always as green as they seem

The “flight-shame” movement encourages travellers to go by train instead of plane. But not all rail lines are environmentally friendly