Naming the unspeakable
Genocide overshadows other crimes against humanity
AMONG lawyers and scholars who study conflict, the word “genocide” is sometimes grimly described as the ultimate prize. A judgment that a continuing conflict involves genocide makes intervention more likely. Survivors of a group that has suffered mass slaughter may find a measure of solace when some authority formally acknowledges that what happened was the most heinous of crimes.
This article appeared in the International section of the print edition under the headline “Naming the unspeakable”
International April 18th 2015
More from International
Team Trump is getting handover hints from Team Biden
Even winners can learn some lessons from the losers
Women warriors and the war on woke
Trump’s Pentagon pick wants women off the battlefield
Young people are having less fun
Youthful excess continues to decline
Why people over the age of 55 are the new problem generation
Baby-boomers are keeping their bad habits into retirement
Is the age of American air superiority coming to an end?
The growing effectiveness of air-defence systems could blunt the West’s most powerful weapons
Why warriors should welcome laws of war
Lessons from a 17th-century thinker on preventing crimes against humanity