Craig Wright’s claims to be Satoshi Nakamoto come under fire
The onus is now squarely on Mr Wright to provide better evidence
HAS another Satoshi bitten the dust? Only 90 minutes after Craig Wright, an Australian businessman and computer scientist, had posted online what he claimed to be proof that he is Satoshi Nakamoto, the mysterious creator of bitcoin, a cryptocurrency, it was debunked as fake on Reddit, a website. Instead of providing a digital signature, which would show that he is indeed Mr Nakamoto (because only he could have the cryptographic key to generate it), he posted a string of numbers that is publicly available and can be copied and pasted by anybody who knows where to look.
In our earlier article on Mr Wright’s self-outing, which went live at 8am this morning, we pointed out several reasons for scepticism, prime among them the fact that he refused to provide us with additional proof that he is Mr Nakamoto. If there is cause to give his claim some credence, it is partly because Gavin Andresen, Mr Nakamoto’s successor as the leading developer of the bitcoin software, had confirmed in an interview that he thought Mr Wright’s proof was valid and that he believed “beyond a reasonable doubt” that he is Mr Nakamoto. At a blockchain conference in New York today Mr Andresen said that he still believes that Mr Wright is Mr Nakamoto.
More from Briefing
America’s $61bn aid package buys Ukraine time
It must use it wisely
America is uniquely ill-suited to handle a falling population
Which is a worry, because much of it is already shrinking
Homeowners face a $25trn bill from climate change
Property, the world’s biggest asset class, is also its most vulnerable