Interiors
Why it’s better to have a coastline
BOLIVIA’S quest to recover the coastline it lost in a 19th-century war looks like romantic folly. Much of its trade passes through Chile, and no political deal can reduce the distance between Bolivia’s cities and the sea. But the loss is not just symbolic. If trade flowed freely, being landlocked would be no impediment to growth. In the real world, it is.
With a few exceptions the world’s 45 landlocked countries are poor. Of the 15 lowest-ranking countries in the Human Development Index, eight have no coastline. All of these are in Africa, which is a poor region. But even compared with similar sea-front countries those without coastlines have lagged behind. Their GDP per person is 40% lower than that of their maritime neighbours.
This article appeared in the The Americas section of the print edition under the headline "Interiors"
More from The Americas
Andrés Manuel López Obrador will haunt his successor
Mexico’s next president will struggle against gangs, poverty and migration
Dengue fever is surging in Latin America
The number of people who succumb to the disease has been rising for two decades
Meet Argentina’s richest man
The boss of Mercado Libre ponders Javier Milei, self-doubt and the dangers of wokery