Labour’s problem with anti-Semitism
The Labour Party needs to root out all traces of anti-Semitism—and be seen to be doing so
“JEWS have no better friends in this country than the Labour Party.” So said the Jewish Chronicle in 1920. Almost a century on the newspaper’s tone has changed. When it emerged that Labour’s leader, Jeremy Corbyn, was a member of a private Facebook group littered with anti-Semitic abuse, the Jewish Chronicle’s editor penned a note of despair. “We run far, far less about [Mr Corbyn] and Labour’s anti-Semitism issue than the story probably deserves, precisely to avoid it dominating the paper.”
There has certainly been plenty that could fill its pages. Mr Corbyn’s “unwitting” membership of the Facebook group was the latest anti-Semitism row to embroil the party since he became leader in 2015. Earlier this month, the race to become general secretary was marred by anti-Semitic abuse of Jon Lansman, founder of the left-wing pressure group Momentum. A row over dealing with party members suspended for alleged anti-Semitism has rumbled for months. In 2016 Ken Livingstone, a former mayor of London, was kicked out of the party for suggesting that Adolf Hitler supported Zionism “before he went mad and ended up killing 6m Jews”.
This article appeared in the Britain section of the print edition under the headline "Labour’s concern"
Britain March 17th 2018
- Britain holds Russia to account over the Skripal affair
- The chancellor boasts of good news, but the Brexit effect is plain to see
- Can’t stand the heat
- How bad could it get?
- Labour’s problem with anti-Semitism
- Britain is slowly acquiring a pro-vax movement
- Britain’s stringent rules on medical cannabis harm patients
- Global Britain or globaloney
More from Britain
Why so many Britons have taken to stand-up paddleboarding
It combines fitness, wellness and smugness
Why Britain’s membership of the ECHR has become a political issue
And why leaving would be a mistake
The ECtHR’s Swiss climate ruling: overreach or appropriate?
A ruling on behalf of pensioners does not mean the court has gone rogue