Asia | Banyan

Can TPP go ahead without America?

The Pacific trade pact would still benefit the other 11 members

WHEN, three days after his inauguration, Donald Trump pulled America out of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), a 12-country free-trade deal that his predecessor, Barack Obama, wanted to be his legacy in Asia, it was the fulfilment of a campaign promise. “Great thing for the American worker, what we just did,” he said, as he signed away new markets for American carmakers, farmers and drugs companies, along with the prospect of over 100,000 new American jobs.

Among the other 11 members, the shock was not just over the new president’s hostility to America’s historical role as promoter of an open, rules-based trading order, of which the Asia-Pacific region has been the greatest beneficiary. Without the United States, which accounted for three-fifths of the bloc’s combined GDP, TPP was, in the words of the Japanese prime minister, Shinzo Abe, “meaningless”. After all the sweat and political capital expended in crafting the agreement, which was signed in late 2015 but which only Japan has ratified, TPP was, nearly everyone agreed, now fit only to be buried.

This article appeared in the Asia section of the print edition under the headline "Back from the dead"

The world’s most valuable resource

From the May 6th 2017 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Asia

Chinese firms are expanding in South-East Asia

This new business diaspora is younger, better-educated and ambitious

The family feud that holds the Philippines back

Squabbling between the Marcos and Duterte clans makes politics unpredictable


The Maldives is cosying up to China

A landslide election confirms the trend