The six flavours of Brexit
The EU offers many menus, from Norwegian to Turkish. But there is no à la carte option
JUST over a year has passed since Britain voted to leave the European Union and Theresa May subsequently became prime minister. Nearly four months have elapsed since Mrs May invoked Article 50 of the EU treaty, setting a two-year deadline for Brexit that will expire on March 30th 2019. The clock is ticking. And at first blush there has been much activity: a big speech by Mrs May at Lancaster House in January; several government white papers; bills introduced in Parliament; and the start of formal Brexit negotiations in Brussels.
Yet for all this activity, almost no progress has been made towards deciding the form that Brexit should take. That is largely because the government is ambiguous over what it wants. Even issues that seemed settled in the Lancaster House speech have resurfaced since Mrs May lost her slim parliamentary majority in a snap election she called for June 8th.
This article appeared in the Britain section of the print edition under the headline "The six flavours of Brexit"
Britain July 22nd 2017
- The six flavours of Brexit
- Most Leavers want a hard Brexit. Voters at large want a soft one
- After Grenfell, councils scramble to fireproof their buildings
- Engels returns to Manchester
- Acid attacks have a long history in Britain
- “Puke for payout”, the scam making holiday firms sick
- British politics has become dangerously bad-tempered
More from Britain
Why so many Britons have taken to stand-up paddleboarding
It combines fitness, wellness and smugness
Why Britain’s membership of the ECHR has become a political issue
And why leaving would be a mistake
The ECtHR’s Swiss climate ruling: overreach or appropriate?
A ruling on behalf of pensioners does not mean the court has gone rogue