Jeff Sessions is in peril; so is America
What could happen if Donald Trump sacks his attorney-general
PERHAPS the only reason to doubt Donald Trump is contemplating sacking his attorney-general, Jeff Sessions, in order to protect himself and his associates from the counter-espionage investigation being run by Robert Mueller, is that the president has been so astonishingly upfront about it. On July 25th he tweeted that the attorney-general, one of his earliest and most influential supporters, was “VERY weak”. Asked whether he intended to sack him, he replied: “Time will tell.” Yet Mr Trump’s history of rule-breaking suggested he was indeed weighing a measure that would pitch his scandal-plagued presidency into its biggest crisis yet.
Mr Trump said he was angry with Mr Sessions because he had recused himself from an FBI investigation into Russia’s efforts to fix the election in Mr Trump’s favour, with possible assistance from members of the Trump campaign team. Mr Sessions announced that decision in March, after it was revealed that he had withheld details of meetings with a Russian diplomat, Sergey Kislyak, during his Senate confirmation hearings.
This article appeared in the United States section of the print edition under the headline "Pondering the next big crisis"
United States July 29th 2017
- If America is overrun by low-skilled migrants...
- Congress does not trust the president
- Jeff Sessions is in peril; so is America
- Why the president wants to ban trans people from serving
- To pass health-care reform, Republicans may strip it down
- How the riots of 50 years ago changed Detroit
- Naming New York’s neighbourhoods
- Why everybody liked Norman Rockwell
More from United States
Plenty of circumstantial evidence at Donald Trump’s trial
But prosecutors will need Michael Cohen to seal the deal
Why online marketplaces have not killed the estate sale
Is it easier to get people to buy old junk in person?
America’s federal district courts may soon be harder to manipulate
For once Democrats and (some) Republicans see eye-to-eye on judicial reform