Europe | Grant me greenery, but not yet

Climate change will feature heavily in Germany’s election

But the difficult discussions will have to wait

|Bingen am Rhein

THE FIRST sign of trouble on the Rhine, Europe’s busiest inland waterway, was when the river cruises and hotel ships disappeared. Then the cargo vessels got smaller, or simply stopped sailing; goods like coal were shifted to trains. Water levels fell low enough to expose unexploded wartime bombs. These grim scenes, described by Florian Krekel of the Bingen office of Germany’s Waterways and Shipping Administration, date from autumn 2018, when a long drought so depleted the waters along this scenic part of the Rhine that navigation became near-impossible. Manufacturers on the river had to slash production, exporters were cut off from world markets and petrol stations in Cologne had to raise prices. The disruption shaved 0.2% off German GDP, according to the Kiel Institute for the World Economy.

Over two-thirds of Germany’s land area was afflicted by the great drought of 2018. Soon afterwards climate change shot up the list of voters’ priorities (see chart). And as its effects, potential or actual, on Germany’s waterways, forests and farms have become harder to ignore, it has remained at or near the top ever since. Germany’s parties, gearing up for an election in late September, are reacting accordingly.

This article appeared in the Europe section of the print edition under the headline "Grant me greenery, but not yet"

Broadbandits: The surging cyberthreat from spies and crooks

From the June 19th 2021 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Europe

A fresh Russian push will test Ukraine severely, says a senior general

An interview with Vadym Skibitsky, deputy head of Ukraine’s military intelligence

Europeans lack visceral attachment to the EU. Does it matter?

In search of the missing European demos


Donald Tusk mulls which of the previous government’s plans to axe

The Polish populists’ projects were often preposterous, but not always