Culture | Spelling glee

The stories behind the Oxford English Dictionary

Anyone who finds dictionaries boring has not read Sarah Ogilvie’s new book

Dr Murray and his editorial team working on the OED in the Scriptorium.
“L” is for logophileImage: Bodleian Libraries/University of Oxford

In July 1915 an ailing James Murray (pictured), one of the early editors of the Oxford English Dictionary (OED), defined one final word. He had dedicated 36 years to the dictionary; his toil had taken a toll. Knowing he would not see the project complete, he wrote his last entry: for “twilight”.

The poetic pathos of Murray’s final days is one of many memorable tales in “The Dictionary People”. Conceived in 1857, the OED was a huge crowdsourcing project—“the Wikipedia of the 19th century”—comprising 3,000 people. The idea was to create a “descriptive” dictionary that tracked words’ use and meaning over time (unlike its “prescriptive” 18th-century predecessor by Samuel Johnson, which told readers how to say and use words). Volunteers read widely, mailing in examples of how “rare, obsolete, old-fashioned, new, peculiar” words were used. What is surprising about this fairly random method is that it worked, achieving order through the large number of contributors.

This article appeared in the Culture section of the print edition under the headline "Spelling glee"

Are free markets history? The rise of homeland economics

From the October 7th 2023 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Culture

The NHL failed in Arizona, but it’s succeeding in America

Ice hockey is flourishing as an increasingly American sport

True tales of secrecy, opacity and outright thievery in art

Two outsiders tried to crack the art business. They did not like what they found


For a colossal challenge, try tower-running

The sport, which involves hurrying up high-rises, is ascendant