The stories behind the Oxford English Dictionary
Anyone who finds dictionaries boring has not read Sarah Ogilvie’s new book
In July 1915 an ailing James Murray (pictured), one of the early editors of the Oxford English Dictionary (OED), defined one final word. He had dedicated 36 years to the dictionary; his toil had taken a toll. Knowing he would not see the project complete, he wrote his last entry: for “twilight”.
The poetic pathos of Murray’s final days is one of many memorable tales in “The Dictionary People”. Conceived in 1857, the OED was a huge crowdsourcing project—“the Wikipedia of the 19th century”—comprising 3,000 people. The idea was to create a “descriptive” dictionary that tracked words’ use and meaning over time (unlike its “prescriptive” 18th-century predecessor by Samuel Johnson, which told readers how to say and use words). Volunteers read widely, mailing in examples of how “rare, obsolete, old-fashioned, new, peculiar” words were used. What is surprising about this fairly random method is that it worked, achieving order through the large number of contributors.
This article appeared in the Culture section of the print edition under the headline "Spelling glee"
Culture October 7th 2023
- Decoding Sam Bankman-Fried, alleged titan of crypto conmen
- “Cat Person”, an internet-breaking short story, is back as a film
- The stories behind the Oxford English Dictionary
- A new book revisits a bus crash that killed Palestinian children
- The AR-15 is a symbol of liberty or loss, depending on whom you ask
More from Culture
The NHL failed in Arizona, but it’s succeeding in America
Ice hockey is flourishing as an increasingly American sport
True tales of secrecy, opacity and outright thievery in art
Two outsiders tried to crack the art business. They did not like what they found
For a colossal challenge, try tower-running
The sport, which involves hurrying up high-rises, is ascendant