Analects | Chen Guangcheng

The great escape

A blind activist’s flight into American custody tests a vital relationship

By J.M. | BEIJING

THE STORY of how Chen Guangcheng, a 40-year-old blind villager, escaped through the prison-like security cordon surrounding his home and ended up hundreds of miles away in Beijing under American diplomatic protection will long be recounted as one of the most dramatic episodes in America's dealings with China over human rights. After six days at the American Embassy, Mr Chen left “of his own accord”, the two governments said, to receive medical treatment in a Beijing hospital. Mr Chen, it was reported, would stay in China and be allowed to attend university. A subsequent report from Associated Press stated that Mr Chen left the embassy after threats were made against his wife. [UPDATE: And then, not many hours later, citing the menace posed to his life and his family's, Mr Chen said he wants to go to the United States after all. The situation is in flux.]

Despite ubiquitous complaints by Chinese about human-rights abuses, there has only been one other known example of a dissident being granted protective custody by a foreign diplomatic mission in Communist-ruled China. That was in 1989, when Fang Lizhi, an astrophysicist accused by China of stirring up the Tiananmen Square unrest that year, was admitted with his wife to the American ambassador's residence. Arrangements for their safe passage to America, where Mr Fang died last month, took more than a year. China is now a much stronger country and America far more anxious not to displease it. The announcement on May 2nd that Mr Chen had left the embassy (he checked into a hospital, accompanied by America's ambassador, Gary Locke) appeared to signal at least a temporary compromise. But China also demanded an apology from America for taking Mr Chen into the embassy and gave no public guarantee of his safety.

Both countries were anxious that Mr Chen's flight should not spoil their annual high-level “strategic and economic dialogue”, a two-day event which began in Beijing on May 3rd. They are being led on the American side by the secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, and the treasury secretary, Timothy Geithner, neither of whom want a human-rights case to overshadow discussions about issues ranging from a possibly imminent nuclear test by North Korea to global economic rebalancing. The timing was especially bad for China, which was already under enormous political stress following the flight of a senior provincial official to an American consulate in Chengdu in February and the dismissal it led to of a Politburo member, Bo Xilai.

Mr Chen's journey began in the village of Dongshigu in Shandong Province, more than 500 km (300 miles) south-east of Beijing, where he had been kept under house arrest since his release at the end of a four-year jail term in 2010. Local officials have long been determined to silence Mr Chen, a self-taught legal worker who became widely known for championing victims of local injustice. Mr Chen particularly angered the authorities by exposing forced sterilisations and abortions involving thousands of women in connection with China's one-child policy. No legal basis was ever produced for keeping Mr Chen confined to his home, nor for deploying dozens of thugs to keep visitors away, sometimes with violence. The goons appeared to enjoy backing from at least some leaders in Beijing.

Hu Jia, a Beijing-based activist who met Mr Chen after his escape, says that during the night Mr Chen climbed over the two-metre high concrete wall built by the government to seal off his house. (The house was normally floodlit by his guards, who also jammed mobile-phone signals.) For some 20 hours, says Mr Hu, Mr Chen struggled on his own, navigating “eight lines of defence” and falling down “more than 200 times” before meeting another activist, He Peirong, who drove him to Beijing. Mr Hu says that Mr Chen wept and said repeatedly, “brother, brother”, as the two men embraced for the first time in seven years. Mr Chen's hand trembled constantly as it gripped Mr Hu's.

Mr Chen's problems were not yet over, however. Before he was finally delivered into American protection Mr Chen was followed in Beijing by what appeared to be secret police. Mr Hu says he does not know whether the police were aware they were tailing Mr Chen, or whether they were merely conducting routine surveillance of his dissident escort. Both countries kept quiet about Mr Chen's escape and his sojourn at the embassy until after he left. China then made its anger clear, accusing America of interfering in China's internal affairs. It said this was “utterly unacceptable” and called on America to “deal with” those responsible, apparently meaning diplomats who helped him.

Some of this could be posturing, aimed at defusing criticism of the leadership by hardliners resentful of any kind of negotiation with America over the fate of a Chinese citizen. Hardliners are a powerful force in China's security apparatus. Since Mr Chen's flight, several activists who helped or met Mr Chen after his escape, including Mr Hu, have been called in by police in Beijing and elsewhere for interrogations about how he achieved the feat. Ms He, who drove him to Beijing, remains missing. Mr Chen's wife and two children have been escorted by officials to join him in Beijing. But even if America has secured a way of ensuring their safety, others like them can still expect short shrift.

Editor's note: This story was last updated on May 3rd at 04:30 GMT to reflect a new report from Reuters.

More from Analects

Analects says "Goodbye"

The other Occupy Central

Hong Kong’s protesting students may have a long wait for equal treatment if the treatment of housemaids is any guide


Crosses to bear

THE atheist Communist Party is faced with the growing popularity of religion