Babbage | A busy week for space buffs

Cosmic revelations

The Dragon docks with the ISS and the world's biggest radio telescope finds a home—or two

By J.P.

THIS has been a busy week for space buffs. First, SpaceX, a company founded by Elon Musk, co-founder of PayPal, an internet-payments firm, successfully launched its Dragon space capsule into orbit on May 22nd. Now, three days later, the Dragon made history by becoming the first private craft to dock with the International Space Station (ISS), after it was clasped by a robotic arm (see picture) and brought to a berthing port. All that remains is to unpack the half a tonne's worth of payload, including food and other supplies, it has ferried to the orbital station on behalf of NASA, America's space agency. In between Mr Musk's feats, Jeff Bezos, the internet tycoon behind Amazon, an online retailer, put the result of his space venture's engineering efforts, the prototype Charon craft, on display at Seattle's Museum of Flight.

Most momentous of all, though, could be a decision announced in Amsterdam just hours before Don Pettit, an American astronaut aboard the ISS, "got us a Dragon by its tail", as he put it. The board of the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) consortium decided whether to build a new radio telescope in South Africa, whose bid was recommended by a panel set up to look into the matter, or Australia. In the event, the consortium decided to split the site between Boolardy Station in Western Australia and the Karoo in South Africa's Northern Cape.

Both sites are well-suited to radio telescopy. They are out of the way and experience little man-made radio interference from mobile-phone networks, television and radio broadcasts. The politic solution has been welcomed, officially at least, by the competing nations, though South Africa's ministry of science and technology sounded a slightly disappointed note in a statement. However, Bernie Fanaroff, who spearheaded the African bid, was ebullient about the prospect of his country hosting what is, physically speaking, the world's biggest scientific experiment (and, no doubt, the contracts that come with it).

The SKA may be less sexy than the Dragon and the ISS. It is certainly cheaper; its estimated €1.5 billion-2 billion ($1.9 billion-2.5 billion) price tag may be hefty as scientific projects go, but it pales in comparison with the $100 billion already poured into the ISS. Yet unlike the orbital station the radio telescope, 50-100 times more powerful than any predecessor, promises to do plenty of useful science, by exploring the formation of the first stars and galaxies, the role of magnetism in the early cosmos, the nature of dark matter, dark energy and gravity, and whether intelligent life has ever existed anywhere besides Earth.

The sheer scale of the endeavour is mind-boggling. A typical optical telescope might have a diameter a few million times the wavelength of the light it is collecting. Applying that scale to radio astronomy—where wavelengths are measured in centimetres—would require dishes several kilometres across. Building a single dish of that size would be impractical, so the SKA is planning to use around 50,000 smaller receivers stitched together in a vast web.

Many of the receivers were to be concentrated in a core about 5km on a side, with the rest arranged into a set of elegant spiral arms 1,500km long. A signal processing technique known as interferometry would then allow the cluster to function as one virtual instrument, with a receiving area equal to the combined area of the individual dishes (yes, one square kilometre) and a baseline (a measure of the telescope's resolving power) equal to the distance between the furthest individual components—or about 3,000km.

How exactly the SKA will work across two continents is something the consortium has yet to figure out. The idea is for each of the sites to focus on a different part of the radio spectrum—Australia for the lower end and South Africa for the rest. Tim O' Brien, from Britain's Jodrell Bank Observatory, which was chosen last year as the SKA's headquarters, told the BBC the split did not pose a huge challenge.

Yet splitting the project is bound to increase its already considerable technical complexity. And it will almost certainly raise the ultimate price, possibly closer to the $6 billion America's National Science Foundation reckoned it would cost when the United States decided not to join in. That said, it would still be a bargain compared to the ISS—and, if it were to deliver on all its scientific promise, possibly a small price to pay for unravelling more of the mysteries of the universe.

More from Babbage

And it’s goodnight from us

Why 10, not 9, is better than 8

For Microsoft, Windows 10 is both the end of the line and a new beginning


Future, imperfect and tense

Deadlines in the future are more likely to be met if they are linked to the mind's slippery notions of the present