HUNTING for a new leader in the midst of a brutal battle for market leadership is hardly ideal. But that is the predicament in which Intel now finds itself. On November 19th Paul Otellini, the firm’s chief executive (pictured), surprised the industry and investors by announcing that he would retire from the semiconductor behemoth next May—several years before he had been expected to stand down. The company’s board said in a statement that it will consider both internal and external candidates to fill Mr Otellini’s shoes.
Whoever steps into them will have a tough act to follow. Under Mr Otellini’s eight years at Intel’s helm, annual revenue rose from $39 billion to $54 billion and earnings-per-share grew from $1.40 to $2.39. But the computing landscape is changing rapidly, and in ways that threaten Intel’s dominant position in the semiconductor business. The company flourished as part of the “Wintel” alliance—shorthand for Microsoft’s Windows operating system and Intel’s chips, which still power the majority of personal computers. But PC sales have come under pressure as people have embraced mobile computing devices such as smartphones and tablet computers.
Both Microsoft and Intel pooh-pooh talk of a “post-PC world”. But there is little doubt that the centre of gravity in computing is shifting towards mobile devices, many of which use power-efficient chips designed by ARM Holdings, a British firm. It licenses its processor designs to firms such as Qualcomm and Nvidia, who get the chips made by contract manufacturers such as GlobalFoundries and TSMC. Qualcomm, which is a good proxy for the ARM ecosystem, recently saw its market capitalisation exceed that of Intel (which has three times the revenues of Qualcomm).
