Leaders | Social policies

Time to scrap affirmative action

Governments should be colour-blind

ABOVE the entrance to America’s Supreme Court four words are carved: “Equal justice under law”. The court is pondering whether affirmative action breaks that promise. The justices recently accepted a case concerning a vote in Michigan that banned it, and will soon rule on whether the University of Texas’s race-conscious admissions policies are lawful. The question in both cases is as simple as it is divisive: should government be colour-blind?

America is one of many countries where the state gives a leg-up to members of certain racial, ethnic, or other groups by holding them to different standards. The details vary. In some countries, the policy applies only to areas under direct state control, such as public-works contracts or admission to public universities. In others, private firms are also obliged to take account of the race of their employees, contractors and even owners. But the effects are strikingly similar around the world (see article).

This article appeared in the Leaders section of the print edition under the headline "Time to scrap affirmative action"

Race, colour, caste: Time to scrap affirmative action

From the April 27th 2013 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Leaders

How “judge-mandering” is eroding trust in America’s judiciary

The assignment of judges to cases should be random, not political

The world’s most improbable success story still needs to evolve

Under Lawrence Wong, the city-state has a new chance to change


What companies can expect if Labour wins Britain’s election

The party that aspires to lead the country is courting business