Middle East and Africa | Nuclear diplomacy and Iran

Where’s the deal?

Even if direct negotiations between the United States and Iran ensue, few predict a happy outcome

|WASHINGTON, DC

ON THE face of it, all that is needed at this stage of Iran’s nuclear diplomacy with the United States and other world powers is for the Iranians and the so-called P5+1 (the UN Security Council’s permanent members plus Germany) to agree on a time and a place for their next meeting. Instead, each side has been blaming the other for refusing to make any commitment. A European official has spoken of Iranian “delaying tactics”, while the press in Tehran denounces the “unpreparedness” of Iran’s Western interlocutors.

“If the two sides can’t agree on details of this kind,” rues a seasoned Iran-watcher in Washington, “it doesn’t bode well for the negotiations themselves.” Indeed, for all the conciliatory instincts of America’s re-elected president and his nomination of relative doves to run important parts of foreign policy, even advocates of detente are sceptical about the prospect of improved relations in Barack Obama’s second term.

This article appeared in the Middle East & Africa section of the print edition under the headline "Where’s the deal?"

The next supermodel

From the February 2nd 2013 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Middle East and Africa

University protests about Gaza spread to the Middle East

But Arab students are looking to America for inspiration

Gulf governments are changing, but not how they talk to citizens

Rumours about downpours in Dubai and rosé in Riyadh stem from a lack of trust


How South Africa has changed 30 years after apartheid

Poverty is rife and inequality still starkly racial