Reinhart-Rogoff reprise
Some thoughts on the recent debate
By R.A. | WASHINGTON
AFTER watching the recent feeding frenzy over challenges to the Reinhart-Rogoff debt-threshold stylised fact—that growth rates slow sharply once public debt rises above around 90% of GDP—I feel like it's worth making a few points.
1) Carmen Reinhart and Kenneth Rogoff did not cause the shift toward fiscal consolidation. If one had to list contributing factors to that shift in order of importance, I doubt their work would rate the top ten. Easily the most important driver of the shift was the dynamic shown in the chart at right, which shows the level of public debt. I think it was unreasonable to think that governments would accept that increase in debt with insouciance. And indeed, the Reinhart-Rogoff paper that began the threshold discussion, which was published as a working paper in January of 2010, was a contribution to a discussion that was already well under way. In 2009, the IMF's Fiscal Monitor was already sounding the alarm. Barack Obama's 2010 State of the Union speech which also dated to January of 2010, warned of the dangers of high debt and included plans for a spending freeze. There was no world in which elected leaders didn't begin to worry about and move to address indebtedness.
More from Free exchange
Religious competition was to blame for Europe’s witch hunts
Many children are still persecuted as alleged witches in Africa for similar reasons
Has BRICS lived up to expectations?
The bloc of big emerging economies is surprisingly good at keeping its promises
How to interpret a market plunge
Whether a sudden sharp decline in asset prices amounts to a meaningless blip or something more depends on mass psychology