1789 and all that
The history of fiscal federalism may offer the euro zone some lessons
TRYING to coerce a group of sovereign states to follow common rules is ultimately doomed. Leagues and confederacies are like feudal baronies: breaches lead to anarchy, tyranny and war. That was Alexander Hamilton's case for a strong American federal government. After the adoption of America's constitution, Hamilton became treasury secretary. The federal government assumed the war debts of the ex-colonies, issued new national bonds backed by direct taxes and minted its own currency. Hamilton's new financial system helped transform the young republic from a basket-case into an economic powerhouse.
Does Europe, in its chronic financial crisis, need such a “Hamiltonian moment”? The European elite is looking across the Atlantic for ideas. There is little danger, as Hamilton put it in the Federalist papers, of returning to “bloody wars in which one half of the confederacy has displayed its banners against the other half”. But there is a surging resentment in creditor and debtor countries, and the risk of collapse. As a type of confederation, the euro zone struggles to take decisions, and to impose austerity and reforms on recalcitrant members like Greece.
This article appeared in the Europe section of the print edition under the headline "1789 and all that"
More from Europe
“Our Europe can die”: Macron’s dire message to the continent
Institutions are not for ever, after all
Carbon emissions are dropping—fast—in Europe
Thanks to a price mechanism that actually works
Italy’s government is trying to influence the state-owned broadcaster
Giorgia Meloni’s supporters accuse RAI of left-wing bias