Why is macroeconomics so hard to teach?
Lessons from a master of the craft
LAST month Nick Rowe had a bad dream. It was five minutes before the first class of the autumn term at Carleton University in Ottawa, where he has long taught macroeconomics. But he could not find the classroom. Then he woke up and remembered with relief that he had just retired.
Learning macro is a source of anxiety for many students. Teaching it can give their professors the jitters, too. The subject is notoriously difficult to explain well. During his 37 years at Carleton Mr Rowe remained, by his own admission, “fairly low down the totem pole” as a researcher. But he became a thunderbird at conveying macroeconomic intuition. In the past decade this served him well in his second intellectual career, contributing to Worthwhile Canadian Initiative, an economics blog. Many a controversy has benefited from one of his ingenious analogies or numerical parables, usually involving some kind of fruit.
This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline "Mangonomics"
Finance & economics August 11th 2018
- Is China losing the trade war against America?
- Tariffs on steel and aluminium are creating some winners
- Blockchains could breathe new life into prediction markets
- Factor-based investing spreads from stocks to bonds
- Our cities house-price index suggests the property market is slowing
- Why the largest group of American corporate bonds is a notch above junk
- Why is macroeconomics so hard to teach?
More from Finance and economics
America is in the midst of an extraordinary startup boom
How the country revived its go-getting spirit
Could America and its allies club together to weaken the dollar?
China would not be happy
Banks, at least, are making money from a turbulent world
It is once again a good time to work on a trading desk