Science and technology | Human mating strategies

Cads and dads

Promiscuity and fidelity seem to be specific biological adaptations. Their manifestations in men and women are not as different as you might expect

RECEIVED wisdom and biological theory both have it that males are (or, at least, would like to be) more promiscuous than females. That does not stop a lot of men settling down happily as faithful husbands. Conversely, wisdom and theory also suggest that once a woman has kissed the frog who turns into a prince, she will stick with him till death do them part. But that is belied by the number of females who wander from man to man, or simply do without a helpmeet altogether.

As with many biological phenomena—height, for example—propensity for promiscuity in either sex might be expected to be normally distributed; that is, to follow what are known colloquially as “bell curves”. The peaks of these curves would have different values between the sexes, just as they do in the case of height. But the curves’ shapes would be similar.

Rafael Wlodarski of Oxford University wondered whether things are a little more complicated than that. Perhaps, he and his colleagues posit in a study just published in Biology Letters, rather than cads, dads and their female equivalents simply being at the extremes of a continuous distribution, individual people are specialised for these roles. If so, the curve for each sex would look less like the cross-section of a bell, and more like that of a Bactrian camel, with two humps instead of one.

This article appeared in the Science & technology section of the print edition under the headline "Cads and dads"

Capitalism’s unlikely heroes

From the February 7th 2015 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Science and technology

Producing fake information is getting easier

But that’s not the whole story, when it comes to AI

Disinformation is on the rise. How does it work?

Understanding it will lead to better ways to fight it


Fighting disinformation gets harder, just when it matters most

Researchers and governments need to co-ordinate; tech companies need to open up