Clayton Christensen’s insights will outlive him
The Harvard professor made lasting contributions to the field of disruptive innovation
“WHEN I DIE and they’re going to interview me outside of heaven to decide whether...to let me in,” Clayton Christensen once told an Economist conference, “I’m going to start by saying ‘I’ve got some questions for you first’.” Mr Christensen, who died of leukaemia on January 23rd, aged 67, was endlessly seeking answers. The most important, to the question “why do great firms fail?”, inspired “The Innovator’s Dilemma”. The book, published in 1997, popularised the idea of disruptive innovation. It made the Harvard Business School professor the most influential management thinker of his time.
He disliked the term “guru”. It sat awkwardly with him, as he sat awkwardly on stage: a lanky two-metre-tall Mormon who laced conversations with exclamations like “Holy Cow!” and knotted his fingers together as if trying to stop his enthusiasm from bounding out. He was the antithesis of Silicon Valley’s self-promoters who, often in his name, turned innovation and disruption into the most overhyped words in business. Still, unlike most management theories, which live and die like fruit flies, his will outlast him.
This article appeared in the Business section of the print edition under the headline "An existential questioner"
Business February 1st 2020
- Deutschland AG rethinks workers’ role in management
- Most of the world has yet to embrace co-determination
- Tesla is proving itself as a carmaker
- Airbus agrees to pay €3.6bn to settle a bribery case
- Luxury groups ponder ways to get rid of their unsold inventory
- From the cradle to the Grove
- Facebook unveils details of its content-oversight board
- Clayton Christensen’s insights will outlive him
More from Business
Can Nvidia be dethroned? Meet the startups vying for its crown
A new generation of AI chips is on the way
What do Joe Biden and the boss of Starbucks have in common?
Both are grappling with gloomy consumers at home and trouble abroad
How not to name a new car
Companies that get it wrong risk both derision and outrage