FBI files suggest MLK was more complicated than his myth
But can documents from an agency that hounded King be trusted?
IN 1991 OLIVER STONE released a terrible film about John F. Kennedy’s assassination, filled with conspiracy theories about government involvement. Despite, or rather because of, its awfulness the film contributed to the passage of the snappily named President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992. The law compelled anything related to the assassination to be released 25 years after its passage, a date which fell in October 2017.
The definition of relevance was broad, which meant that a large collection of FBI records from the 1960s was made public, if only you knew where to look for them. David Garrow, a historian who has published a Pulitzer-winning biography of Martin Luther King, “Bearing the Cross”, as well as a book about King and the FBI, did know where to look. Last summer he spent two months going through new documents, including summaries of transcripts from the FBI’s Stasi-like surveillance of King’s private life.
This article appeared in the United States section of the print edition under the headline "Regicide"
United States June 8th 2019
- Democratic presidential candidates are making promises they cannot deliver
- Foreign travellers to America face scrutiny of their online activity
- What budget cuts during the Great Recession did to pupils’ test scores
- What it’s like to spend half a life in solitary confinement
- Baseball and American exceptionalism
- FBI files suggest MLK was more complicated than his myth
More from United States
A mano-a-mano contest between Michael Cohen and Donald Trump
The hush-money trial hinges on the testimony of one man
Who’s winning at the Trump trial?
Stormy Daniels held her own. Hope Hicks cried. Michael Cohen is up next