United States | Prosecuting Flint

High-ranking officials claim immunity over poisonous water

The cases will run and run

Who does this belong to?
|CHICAGO

FOR 18 months in 2014 and 2015 the inhabitants of Flint, a poor city in Michigan, drank tap water that was contaminated with lead and potentially lethal bacteria. Now comes the reckoning. Many legal actions have been launched, some of which raise a hard question: to what extent can government officials be held accountable for their actions on the job?

Three types of lawsuits have been filed over the past couple of years. The first consists of actions by citizens and environmental groups focused on government enforcement of the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), a federal law from 1974. The second group includes criminal lawsuits against 15 government employees, including Nick Lyon, the director of Michigan’s Department of Health and Human Services. The third type is a civil class-action lawsuit against government officials, which is being heard in a district court.

This article appeared in the United States section of the print edition under the headline "Prosecuting Flint"

Planet China: What to make of the Belt and Road Initiative

From the July 28th 2018 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from United States

Joe Biden is practising some Clintonian politics

But he needs to do more than crack down on “junk fees” to woo swing voters

A surprising Japanese presence in a traditional American craft

Quilting connects continents


Seaport Tower shows New York’s fight between housing and heritage

Can the city build its future without destroying its past?