High-ranking officials claim immunity over poisonous water
The cases will run and run
FOR 18 months in 2014 and 2015 the inhabitants of Flint, a poor city in Michigan, drank tap water that was contaminated with lead and potentially lethal bacteria. Now comes the reckoning. Many legal actions have been launched, some of which raise a hard question: to what extent can government officials be held accountable for their actions on the job?
Three types of lawsuits have been filed over the past couple of years. The first consists of actions by citizens and environmental groups focused on government enforcement of the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), a federal law from 1974. The second group includes criminal lawsuits against 15 government employees, including Nick Lyon, the director of Michigan’s Department of Health and Human Services. The third type is a civil class-action lawsuit against government officials, which is being heard in a district court.
This article appeared in the United States section of the print edition under the headline "Prosecuting Flint"
United States July 28th 2018
- Donald Trump agrees to cease fire in the trade war with the EU
- The questions over Carter Page’s links with Russia
- Jonathan Gold, poet of the strip-mall eatery
- High-ranking officials claim immunity over poisonous water
- Trump tries a Nixonian move, but lacks Nixon’s skill
- Soon anyone will be able to learn how to print 3D guns
- Catholic bishops’ opposition to Donald Trump emboldens church liberals
More from United States
Joe Biden is practising some Clintonian politics
But he needs to do more than crack down on “junk fees” to woo swing voters
A surprising Japanese presence in a traditional American craft
Quilting connects continents
Seaport Tower shows New York’s fight between housing and heritage
Can the city build its future without destroying its past?