Athleisure shows how clothing’s rules no longer exist

Sportswear brands like Lululemon highlights the world’s new social division, says Adrian Wooldridge, which is between the fat-fighters and the rest of us

By Adrian Wooldridge

Lululemon in Covent Garden feels more like an art gallery than a sportswear shop. Eye-catching posters issue instructions: “sweat, hydrate, sweat, hydrate”. Screens show images of impossibly beautiful people glowing with health. The shop displays its prized products – figure-hugging yoga pants – on the walls like prizewinning artworks. Lululemon has mastered the art of retail in the age of Amazon. But it has done more than that: it has grasped the new fault-line in society.

For most of history clothing was defined by the job you did. People who lifted things wore overalls. Bakers wore aprons. Jeans caught on because they were tough. And those who did no manual labour flaunted that fact loudly: Chinese scholars had long finger nails; gentlewomen wore long dresses; gentlemen sported frock coats.

More from 1843 magazine

1843 magazine | Is America thwarting Britain’s fight against corruption?

For once the Serious Fraud Office had a slam-dunk case. Then the Justice Department showed up

1843 magazine | The Polish president’s last stand against liberalism

Andrzej Duda is waging a rearguard action to obstruct Donald Tusk’s reforms


1843 magazine | “It’s been a very long two weeks”: how the Gaza protests changed Columbia

The camp has been cleared. But the faculty of the Ivy League university remains deeply divided