E-cigarettes are almost certainly better than smoking
But “better than smoking” is not necessarily the same as “good for you”
FOR decades, doctors and governments have been trying to wean smokers from their habit. It is a tricky task. Nicotine is as addictive as heroin and cocaine. There are plenty of officially endorsed methods for quitting. People can try inhalators, gum, lozenges, patches, nasal sprays and prescription drugs. All can help, but few replicate all the physical and social rituals that surround cigarettes. That limits how appealing they are to committed smokers.
It was into this mix that e-cigarettes arrived about a decade ago. Unlike ordinary cigarettes, which rely on burning tobacco to deliver their payload, e-cigarettes use an electric charge to vaporise a dose of nicotine (accompanied, often, by various flavouring chemicals). They have proved extremely popular, particularly in America, Britain and Japan. Public-health officials have been quick to conclude that they are much better than smoking. Consumers, says Robert West, a professor of health psychology at University College London, are “voting with their lungs”.
This article appeared in the Science & technology section of the print edition under the headline "Smoking without fire"
Science & technology September 22nd 2018
- E-cigarettes are almost certainly better than smoking
- Giant larvaceans make their houses from mucus
- Only a tenth of the human genome is studied
- Worn-out cells eventually stop dividing
- Physicists investigate why matter and antimatter are not mirror images
- A Japanese billionaire wants to fly around the moon
More from Science & technology
Archaeologists identify the birthplace of the mysterious Yamnaya
The ancient culture, which transformed Europe, was also less murderous than once thought
Producing fake information is getting easier
But that’s not the whole story, when it comes to AI
Disinformation is on the rise. How does it work?
Understanding it will lead to better ways to fight it