Europe | Shackling judges

Europe confronts Poland over its trampling on the rule of law

Despite its name, the ruling Law and Justice party is no fan of judicial independence

|WARSAW

EVER SINCE the populist Law and Justice (PiS) party took power in 2015, Adam Bodnar, Poland’s human-rights ombudsman, has been warning against its relentless efforts to get control of the courts. To illustrate the danger, he uses an expression from communist times: lex telefonica. In the Polish People’s Republic, verdicts were routinely dictated by a phone call from an apparatchik at party headquarters. Today’s government has more subtle techniques, but the goal is the same, Mr Bodnar says: “If a judge has a case on his desk with some political importance, he should be afraid.”

The European Commission is worried, too. It accuses PiS of violating Poland’s commitments to the rule of law under the European Union’s founding treaty. In 2017 the commission took Poland to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) over laws that gave politicians control over appointing judges. (For example, they lowered judges’ retirement age while letting the justice minister pick whom to exempt.) The ECJ ruled against the Poles, who had in the meantime scrapped some of the measures.

This article appeared in the Europe section of the print edition under the headline "Law and Justice v law and justice"

Intolerant India: How Modi is endangering the world’s biggest democracy

From the January 25th 2020 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Europe

A fresh Russian push will test Ukraine severely, says a senior general

An interview with Vadym Skibitsky, deputy head of Ukraine’s military intelligence

Europeans lack visceral attachment to the EU. Does it matter?

In search of the missing European demos


Donald Tusk mulls which of the previous government’s plans to axe

The Polish populists’ projects were often preposterous, but not always