Europe confronts Poland over its trampling on the rule of law
Despite its name, the ruling Law and Justice party is no fan of judicial independence
EVER SINCE the populist Law and Justice (PiS) party took power in 2015, Adam Bodnar, Poland’s human-rights ombudsman, has been warning against its relentless efforts to get control of the courts. To illustrate the danger, he uses an expression from communist times: lex telefonica. In the Polish People’s Republic, verdicts were routinely dictated by a phone call from an apparatchik at party headquarters. Today’s government has more subtle techniques, but the goal is the same, Mr Bodnar says: “If a judge has a case on his desk with some political importance, he should be afraid.”
The European Commission is worried, too. It accuses PiS of violating Poland’s commitments to the rule of law under the European Union’s founding treaty. In 2017 the commission took Poland to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) over laws that gave politicians control over appointing judges. (For example, they lowered judges’ retirement age while letting the justice minister pick whom to exempt.) The ECJ ruled against the Poles, who had in the meantime scrapped some of the measures.
This article appeared in the Europe section of the print edition under the headline "Law and Justice v law and justice"
Europe January 25th 2020
- Europe confronts Poland over its trampling on the rule of law
- Vladimir Putin wants to rehabilitate Stalin’s pact with Hitler
- A supermarket aims to make Romanian farmers pay tax
- Angela Merkel is loth to take sides over Huawei
- France admits its police are too violent
- Europe has good and bad reasons for wanting more babies
More from Europe
A fresh Russian push will test Ukraine severely, says a senior general
An interview with Vadym Skibitsky, deputy head of Ukraine’s military intelligence
Europeans lack visceral attachment to the EU. Does it matter?
In search of the missing European demos
Donald Tusk mulls which of the previous government’s plans to axe
The Polish populists’ projects were often preposterous, but not always