Counting the cost of Brexit’s impact on trade
The government talks of teething troubles, but the red tape is here to stay
TWO MONTHS after Britain left the single market and customs union in favour of a trade and co-operation agreement (TCA), complaints are multiplying, from seafood sellers and pork exporters (see article) to fashionistas and musicians. Some of these are teething problems, but most are the consequence of Boris Johnson’s decision to prioritise sovereignty over market access.
The biggest political problem is the Northern Ireland protocol, under which the province stays in the single market for goods and the customs union. The government chose this route as an alternative to creating a hard border on the island of Ireland, and has repeatedly denied that it implies border checks between the province and Great Britain. But these were inevitable; and now that they have begun, disrupting trade, the Democratic Unionist Party and some Tories are demanding that Mr Johnson scrap the protocol entirely. He will not do that, but it will be an issue in the election next year to the Northern Ireland Assembly.
This article appeared in the Britain section of the print edition under the headline "Counting the cost"
Britain February 27th 2021
- How British science came to the rescue
- Boris Johnson manages expectations with England’s covid-19 plan
- The feud within the Scottish National Party
- Why “red wall” Tories want to open a coal mine
- The government’s loan programme may create a lot of zombie companies
- Counting the cost of Brexit’s impact on trade
- Why Brexit has left British pig-farmers mired
- Why the British prime minister’s job is an impossible one
More from Britain
Why so many Britons have taken to stand-up paddleboarding
It combines fitness, wellness and smugness
Why Britain’s membership of the ECHR has become a political issue
And why leaving would be a mistake
The ECtHR’s Swiss climate ruling: overreach or appropriate?
A ruling on behalf of pensioners does not mean the court has gone rogue