Jason Stanley on critical race theory and why it matters
Opponents caricature it to blunt calls for necessary structural changes to American institutions
By Jason Stanley
Editor’s note: Twelve months on from the killing of George Floyd, The Economist is publishing a series of articles, films, podcasts, data visualisations and guest contributions on the theme of race in America. To see them visit our hub
POLITICIANS USE critical race theory (CRT) in much the same way that they use Keynesian economics: as cudgels in a propaganda campaign to advance their cherished political goals, with little regard for the actual philosophies at issue. CRT, a doctrine more caricatured than understood, rests upon the distinctly unradical claim that American institutions have systematically fallen short of the country’s egalitarian ideals due to practices that perpetuate racial hierarchies. It began in the 1970s as a way to analyse the intersection of American law and race; its creators were legal scholars such as Derrick Bell and Kimberlé Crenshaw. It has since expanded its purview to analyse American institutions more broadly.
More from By Invitation
Central banks may have misread the impact of QT, says an economist
Tomasz Wieladek thinks it could lead to faster-than-expected rate cuts
Indonesia’s president-elect accuses the West of double standards
Valuing Ukrainian over Gazan lives is morally indefensible, says Prabowo Subianto
A conservative strategist on how Joe Biden can win
Sarah Longwell says “double-haters” will decide the election