Prospero | Rough and wild

Greta Gerwig’s adaptation of “Little Women” lacks heart

Blame the disjointed narrative format and the stilted performances

By E.W.

EARLIER THIS year “This American Life”, an American public-radio show and podcast, ran a remarkable segment in a broadcast called “The Weight of Words”. Listeners heard the story of Shamyla, an ordinary American child who grew up in suburban Maryland in the late 1980s. But at the age of 12 she was taken on a trip to Pakistan, where much of her family still lived, and she was, in essence, held captive for years on end. She had one book in her possession: Louisa May Alcott’s “Little Women”.

Published in the years immediately after the American civil war, Alcott’s novel presents the lives of the March sisters—Meg, Jo, Beth and Amy—and their mother, “Marmee”, who are left to fend for themselves while their father is away serving as a chaplain in the Union Army. The book became, for Shamyla, both a talisman and a book of instruction: it offered an image of freedom, in the wilfulness and creativity of its central heroine, Jo. It offered too a model of how Shamyla might be made to survive in conservative Pakistani society, by marrying and behaving as a “proper” woman should. “I felt like I lived with them,” Shamyla said of the characters.

More from Prospero

An American musical about mental health takes off in China

The protagonist of “Next to Normal” has bipolar disorder. The show is encouraging audiences to open up about their own well-being

Sue Williamson’s art of resistance

Aesthetics and politics are powerfully entwined in the 50-year career of the South African artist


What happened to the “Salvator Mundi”?

The recently rediscovered painting made headlines in 2017 when it fetched $450m at auction. Then it vanished again