United States | Deliberative or disgraced?

What the death of America’s border bill says about toxic congressional politics

Republicans opt for theatre instead of governance

Asylum seekers rush to be processed by border-patrol agents near the US-Mexico border in California.
Photograph: Getty Images
|Los Angeles

THE LIFE of the Senate’s bill to increase border security in exchange for sending aid to Ukraine was wretched and short. Its three main negotiators released the text on Sunday. On Monday it had the support of Mitch McConnell, the chamber’s top Republican. By Tuesday it was dead. “It looks to me, and to most of our members, as if we have no real chance here to make a law,” Mr McConnell conceded.

But that is only because of the petulant actions of those members. Republicans’ negative reactions in both chambers of Congress were overwhelming and swift—considering the bill is 370 pages long. Mike Johnson, the Republican speaker of the House of Representatives, posted on X (formerly Twitter) that the bill would be “dead on arrival” in the lower chamber. That is despite voters’ approval: a recent poll from YouGov suggests that a narrow plurality of Americans support the compromise.

Explore more

This article appeared in the United States section of the print edition under the headline "Deliberative or disgraced?"

Who is in control? Xi v the markets

From the February 10th 2024 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from United States

Bayer wants legislative help to fight its cancer lawsuits

But the maker of Roundup weedkiller faces opposition from Republican and Democratic hardliners

After a season of Gaza protests, America’s university graduates are polarised but resilient

After enduring covid and turmoil over free speech, the class of 2024 finally takes its bow


Can playing cards help catch criminals?

A novel idea for solving cold cases comes with high-stakes risks