Finance and economics | Conflict finance

Frozen Russian assets will soon pay for Ukraine’s war

And America now hopes to convince others to make better use of the stash

Ukrainian demonstration requesting the frozen assets of the Russian Central Bank
Photograph: Getty Images

After Russia destroyed the Trypilska power plant on April 11th, Ukraine blamed a lack of anti-missile ammunition. The country’s leaders are also desperate for more financial support. The two shortages—of ammunition and money—reflect different constraints among Ukraine’s allies. Whereas the lack of ammunition is mostly the product of limited industrial capacity, the lack of money is the product of limited political will.

In one area, though, there are signs of progress: over what to do with Russia’s frozen assets. After Vladimir Putin invaded Ukraine, Western governments quickly locked down €260bn-worth ($282bn) of Russian assets, which have remained frozen ever since. Proposals about what to do with them have ranged from the radical (seize them and hand them over to Ukraine) to the creative (force them to be reinvested in Ukrainian war bonds). Until recently, none has found widespread favour with Western governments.

Explore more

This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline "Drip into torrent"

Reasons to be cheerful about Generation Z

From the April 20th 2024 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Finance and economics

What campus protesters get wrong about divestment

Will withdrawing money hurt Israel?

Hedge funds make billions as India’s options market goes ballistic

The country’s retail investors are doing less well


Russia’s gas business will never recover from the war in Ukraine

Hopes of a Chinese rescue look increasingly vain