The British government’s response to Ukrainian refugees is sadly typical
Just ask an Afghan
“O F COURSE WE’RE going to take refugees,” promised Boris Johnson, Britain’s prime minister, as Ukrainians dodged Russian bombs. “The UK is way out in front in our willingness to help.” You hardly dare imagine what unwillingness would look like. Britain’s treatment of Ukrainian refugees so far has combined foot-dragging, hard-heartedness, ineptitude and dishonesty. It is sadly typical of the government.
As the invasion began, European Union countries quickly agreed that all Ukrainians could enter without visas and could live, work and receive welfare for at least a year. By contrast, the country that Mr Johnson calls “Global Britain”, which supposedly left the stodgy, bureaucratic EU to pursue closer relations with places (like Ukraine) that are outside the bloc, came up with the meanest offer imaginable. The home secretary, Priti Patel, said Ukrainians might be granted refuge if they had close family members already in Britain. But they would have to obtain visas before being let into the country. After all, Russian infiltrators and “extremists” might be trying to sneak in. Officials even insinuated that Ireland was hazarding Britain’s security by opening its doors.
This article appeared in the Leaders section of the print edition under the headline "Here’s a form and a KitKat"
More from Leaders
How “judge-mandering” is eroding trust in America’s judiciary
The assignment of judges to cases should be random, not political
The world’s most improbable success story still needs to evolve
Under Lawrence Wong, the city-state has a new chance to change
What companies can expect if Labour wins Britain’s election
The party that aspires to lead the country is courting business