Leaders | Britain and Ukraine

The British government’s response to Ukrainian refugees is sadly typical

Just ask an Afghan

“O F COURSE WE’RE going to take refugees,” promised Boris Johnson, Britain’s prime minister, as Ukrainians dodged Russian bombs. “The UK is way out in front in our willingness to help.” You hardly dare imagine what unwillingness would look like. Britain’s treatment of Ukrainian refugees so far has combined foot-dragging, hard-heartedness, ineptitude and dishonesty. It is sadly typical of the government.

As the invasion began, European Union countries quickly agreed that all Ukrainians could enter without visas and could live, work and receive welfare for at least a year. By contrast, the country that Mr Johnson calls “Global Britain”, which supposedly left the stodgy, bureaucratic EU to pursue closer relations with places (like Ukraine) that are outside the bloc, came up with the meanest offer imaginable. The home secretary, Priti Patel, said Ukrainians might be granted refuge if they had close family members already in Britain. But they would have to obtain visas before being let into the country. After all, Russian infiltrators and “extremists” might be trying to sneak in. Officials even insinuated that Ireland was hazarding Britain’s security by opening its doors.

This article appeared in the Leaders section of the print edition under the headline "Here’s a form and a KitKat"

The Stalinisation of Russia

From the March 10th 2022 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Leaders

How “judge-mandering” is eroding trust in America’s judiciary

The assignment of judges to cases should be random, not political

The world’s most improbable success story still needs to evolve

Under Lawrence Wong, the city-state has a new chance to change


What companies can expect if Labour wins Britain’s election

The party that aspires to lead the country is courting business