Britain | Protospasm

Rishi Sunak’s uphill struggle to make Brexit work in Northern Ireland

He faces familiar opposition from hardliners in Westminster and unionists in Belfast

BELFAST, NORTHERN IRELAND - JANUARY 17: General views of the Belfast harbour estate seen on January 17, 2023 in Belfast, Northern Ireland. Following a joint statement by British foreign secretary James Cleverly and EU negotiator Maros Sefcovic, the EU and the British government have pledged to continue intensive talks on the Northern Ireland protocol, but announced no breakthrough amid a growing expectation that Stormont elections could be postponed again in the coming days. Northern Ireland has been without a functioning government since the collapse of the Stormont assembly with the unionist DUP party refusing to form a power sharing executive unless their demands are met regarding the NI protocol. (Photo by Charles McQuillan/Getty Images)
Image: Getty Images
|Belfast and London

The sense of déjà vu has been unavoidable this week. Rishi Sunak, the prime minister, has been grappling with the hardest problem created by Britain’s decision to leave the EU in 2016—the status of Northern Ireland. His efforts have prompted predictable opposition, from hardline Brexiteers in Westminster and from unionists in the province. As The Economist went to press, Mr Sunak’s proposed deal to revise the Northern Ireland protocol was hanging in the balance and with it, the prospects for effective government on either side of the Irish Sea.

The protocol was concocted by Boris Johnson in 2019. It left the province in the European single market for goods and required checks for products crossing the Irish Sea from Great Britain. In protest at this forced separation, the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP), the main unionist (pro-British) party, pulled out of the Northern Irish executive in February 2022. It said it would not return unless the protocol was in effect scrapped. The DUP’s intransigence was bolstered last May when Mr Johnson himself proposed a bill to allow Britain to unilaterally override the protocol if the EU did not soften it. He also demanded that the European Court of Justice (ECJ) lose any jurisdiction in the province. Relations between Britain and the EU markedly soured.

This article appeared in the Britain section of the print edition under the headline "Protospasm"

The future of Ukraine

From the February 25th 2023 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Britain

Why so many Britons have taken to stand-up paddleboarding

It combines fitness, wellness and smugness

Why Britain’s membership of the ECHR has become a political issue

And why leaving would be a mistake


The ECtHR’s Swiss climate ruling: overreach or appropriate?

A ruling on behalf of pensioners does not mean the court has gone rogue