Hat-wearing is now a snub to authority

Adrian Wooldridge yearns for the days when if you wanted to get ahead, you got a hat

By Adrian Wooldridge

Historians have struggled to find the best shorthand description of the modern era. Is it the post-industrial age, because most people work in offices rather than factories? Or the post-modern age of growing scepticism about enlightenment rationality? Some even call it the post-truth age. I prefer to think of it as the post-hat age.

Hats used to be ubiquitous. They were symbols of social roles: kings wore crowns, bishops mitres, clerks bowlers and labourers cloth caps. They were also fashion statements: milliners like Miller Christie were some of the most celebrated fashionistas of their times. Hats left their mark on the British landscape with thriving hatmaking towns such as Luton and Stockbridge, and on the language with phrases such as “old hat”, “hat trick” and “mad as a hatter” (the chemicals used to make hats drove many hatmakers insane).

More from 1843 magazine

1843 magazine | The Polish president’s last stand against liberalism

Andrzej Duda is waging a rearguard action to obstruct Donald Tusk’s reforms

1843 magazine | “It’s been a very long two weeks”: how the Gaza protests changed Columbia

The camp has been cleared. But the faculty of the Ivy League university remains deeply divided


1843 magazine | Rahul Gandhi is on the march. But where is he heading?

He wants to be the champion of Indian liberalism. First he needs to save his party from irrelevance