Leaders | When robots do research

How artificial intelligence can revolutionise science

Consider the historical precedents

Image: Pete Ryan

DEBATE about artificial intelligence (AI) tends to focus on its potential dangers: algorithmic bias and discrimination, the mass destruction of jobs and even, some say, the extinction of humanity. As some observers fret about these dystopian scenarios, however, others are focusing on the potential rewards. ai could, they claim, help humanity solve some of its biggest and thorniest problems. And, they say, ai will do this in a very specific way: by radically accelerating the pace of scientific discovery, especially in areas such as medicine, climate science and green technology. Luminaries in the field such as Demis Hassabis and Yann LeCun believe that AI can turbocharge scientific progress and lead to a golden age of discovery. Could they be right?

Such claims are worth examining, and may provide a useful counterbalance to fears about large-scale unemployment and killer robots. Many previous technologies have, of course, been falsely hailed as panaceas. The electric telegraph was lauded in the 1850s as a herald of world peace, as were aircraft in the 1900s; pundits in the 1990s said the internet would reduce inequality and eradicate nationalism. But the mechanism by which AI will supposedly solve the world’s problems has a stronger historical basis, because there have been several periods in history when new approaches and new tools did indeed help bring about bursts of world-changing scientific discovery and innovation.

Explore more

This article appeared in the Leaders section of the print edition under the headline “How AI can revolutionise science”

How AI can revolutionise science

From the September 16th 2023 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Leaders

Volodymyr Zelensky’s presidential term expires on May 20th

What does that mean for his country?

Canada’s law to help news outlets is harming them instead

Funding journalism with cash from big tech has become a fiasco


Xi Jinping is subtler than Vladimir Putin—yet equally disruptive

How to deal with Chinese actions that lie between war and peace