United States | The chain

How the Pentagon thinks about America’s strategy in the Pacific

Our correspondent travels through Asia with Lloyd Austin, the defence secretary

US Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin reviews the guard of honour at the Defence Ministry in Tokyo.
Austin’s powersImage: AP
|ON BOARD A US MILITARY AIRCRAFT

How to prevent war with China? And how to win if one breaks out? As American strategists turn to the map, one school argues for holding the “first island chain” that girdles China, from Japan to Malaysia; others prefer to draw the line at the second chain, which runs from Japan to New Guinea. The first is populous and important economically but also vulnerable, lying well within the “weapons engagement zone” of many Chinese missiles; the second is safer and offers more certain access—including American outposts such as Guam. To judge from a flurry of moves by America and its allies, the answer is: redouble the defences of the first chain, but also strengthen the second.

In defence terms, America’s “pivot to Asia” is not a single move, but a weaving of initiatives—with overlapping bi-, tri-, quadri- and multilateral deals—to create an ever-thickening lattice on China’s periphery. Some deals are modest; many are uncertain if tested in war. But they amount to the “fortification of America’s forward defence perimeter in the western Pacific”, says a senior American defence official.

This article appeared in the United States section of the print edition under the headline "The chain"

America’s new best friend: Why India is indispensable

From the June 17th 2023 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from United States

After a season of Gaza protests, America’s university graduates are polarised but resilient

After enduring covid and turmoil over free speech, the class of 2024 finally takes its bow

Can playing cards help catch criminals?

A novel idea for solving cold cases comes with high-stakes risks


The world’s slowest bullet train trundles ahead in California

An extra $3bn of federal funding is nice; as for the other $80bn, dream on